linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.29-rc breaks STD using Intel 945

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:56:20 +0100
From:	Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@...tec.de>
To:	Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@...oo.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	dri-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: 2.6.29-rc breaks STD using Intel 945

Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 07:02:17PM +0100, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> > Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 08:20:56PM +0100, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> > > > I tested several snapshots post 2.6.28 and all of them show one
> > > > severe problem: resume from disk is not always successful. Only about
> > > > 50% of the resume attempts work, in the other cases I just get a
> > > > completely black screen, can't switch to text console or anything.
> > > > What I often get is a line like this in the logs directly before
> > > > suspend:
> > >
> > > Does this happen when X hasn't been started and you suspend to disk
> > > then resume?
> >
> > I tested several times without X, with X running only in backgroud (i.e.
> > me initiating the suspend from console) and from xdm only. Never it
> > froze. That leads me to the conclusion that it is probably related to
> > composite. I'm
>
> Hmm. Does switching to and then back from a virtual terminal also break?

Nope, works fine (testing current git).

Eike

Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)