lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:14:02 -0400 From: Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com> To: Michael Riepe <michael.riepe@...glemail.com> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Where did struct user_regs_struct{,32} go? On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:21:32AM +0100, Michael Riepe wrote: > Am I supposed to roll my own > when I want to ptrace(PTRACE_GETREGS) the registers of a 32-bit process > from 64-bit land? Shouldn't the kernel convert the 32-bit registers into a 64-bit user_regs_struct for GETREGS and convert them back for SETREGS? Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists