linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.29

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
cc:	Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@...e.fr>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Rees <drees76@...il.com>, Jesper Krogh <jesper@...gh.cc>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.29

On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> Yep and twenty years on software hasn´t improved

I really think you're gilding the edges of those old memories. The 
software 20 years ago wasn't that great. I'd say it was on the whole a 
whole lot crappier than it is today.

It's just that we have much higher expectations, and our problem sizes 
have grown a _lot_ faster than rotating disk latencies have improved. 
People didn't worry about having a hundred megs of dirty data and doing an 
'fsync' twenty years ago. Even on big hardware (if you _had_ a hundred 
megs of dirty data you didn't worry about latencies of a few seconds), 
never mind in the Linux world.

This particular problem really largely boils down to "average memory 
capacity has expanded a _lot_ more than harddisk speeds have gone up".

			Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/