lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:31:28 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	tj@...nel.org
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Inverted NUMA test in setup_pcpu_remap()?


The test currently is:

	if (!cpu_has_pse || pcpu_need_numa())
		return -EINVAL;

Don't we really mean "!pcpu_need_numa()"?

The way I read the intent, setup_pcpu_remap() should be used in the
NUMA case.  But that's not what's happening because of how this test
is coded.

In fact, the test here is identical to the one used in
setup_pcpu_embed()
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ