linux-kernel - Re: [PULL] x86 cpumask updates (plus a few generic pre-req cpumask cleanups)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 2 Apr 2009 03:09:25 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
	Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PULL] x86 cpumask updates (plus a few generic pre-req cpumask
	cleanups)

* Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:

> (This is Ingo's cpus4096 branch which has been in linux-next for some weeks,
>  with a trivial merge.)

Yes, that branch was fine and is ready. Thanks Rusty!

Linus, please pull if it looks good to you too.

The gitk output looks pretty nice here - this was one of our 
long-living topic branches.

This was admittedly an accident: there was a single thread of 
contributions/contributors only in this area - thus the history is 
nicely linear/serialized and there's no overlap and no criss-cross 
merging.

In future trees we'll try to achieve this same structure, and not so 
accidentally, even in areas were there's a lot of out-of-order 
execution.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/