| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 09:04:42 +0200 From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> To: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com> Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>, "Balbir Singh" <balbir@...ibm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched: Nominate idle load balancer from a semi-idle package. Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com> writes: > > Improve the algorithm to nominate the idle load balancer from a semi idle > cores/packages thereby increasing the probability of the cores/packages being > in deeper sleep states for longer duration. The basic patch looks good. In theory you could also look for a nearby nohz balancer in the end to optimize traffic on the interconnect of a larger NUMA system, but it's probably not worth it. > > The algorithm is activated only when sched_mc/smt_power_savings != 0. But it seems to me that this check could be dropped and doing it unconditionally, because idle balancing doesn't need much memory bandwith or cpu power, so always putting it nearby is good. -Ani -- ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists