linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] virtual-bus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:54:02 +0300
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC:	Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>, ghaskins@...ell.com,
	anthony@...emonkey.ws, andi@...stfloor.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, agraf@...e.de, pmullaney@...ell.com,
	pmorreale@...ell.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] virtual-bus

Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 02:46:04PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>   
>> The host writes the packet to tap, at which point it is consumed from  
>> its point of view.  The host would like to mention that if there was an  
>> API to notify it when the packet was actually consumed, then it would  
>> gladly use it.  Bonus points if this involves not copying the packet.
>>     
>
> We're using write(2) for this, no? 

Yes.

> That should invoke netif_rx_ni
> which blocks until the packet is "processed", which usually means
> that it's placed on the NIC's hardware queue.
>   

It doesn't copy and queue the packet?  We use O_NONBLOCK and poll() so 
we can tell when we can queue without blocking.

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/