linux-kernel - RE: [Scst-devel] ISCSI-SCST performance (with also IET and STGTdata)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 3 Apr 2009 10:13:35 -0700
From:	"Sufficool, Stanley" <ssufficool@....sbcounty.gov>
To:	"Bart Van Assche" <bart.vanassche@...il.com>,
	"Vladislav Bolkhovitin" <vst@...b.net>
Cc:	"scst-devel" <scst-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [Scst-devel] ISCSI-SCST performance (with also IET and STGTdata)



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bart Van Assche [mailto:bart.vanassche@...il.com] 
> Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 10:09 AM
> To: Vladislav Bolkhovitin
> Cc: scst-devel; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; 
> linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [Scst-devel] ISCSI-SCST performance (with also 
> IET and STGTdata)
> 
> 
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Vladislav Bolkhovitin 
> <vst@...b.net> wrote:
> > Bart Van Assche, on 04/02/2009 12:14 AM wrote:
> >> I have repeated some of these performance tests for iSCSI 
> over IPoIB 
> >> (two DDR PCIe 1.0 ConnectX HCA's connected back to back). 
> The results 
> >> for the buffered I/O test with a block size of 512K (initiator) 
> >> against a file of 1GB residing on a tmpfs filesystem on the target 
> >> are as follows:
> >>
> >> write-test: iSCSI-SCST 243 MB/s; IET 192 MB/s.
> >> read-test: iSCSI-SCST 291 MB/s; IET 223 MB/s.
> >>
> >> And for a block size of 4 KB:
> >>
> >> write-test: iSCSI-SCST 43 MB/s; IET 42 MB/s.
> >> read-test: iSCSI-SCST 288 MB/s; IET 221 MB/s.
> >
> > Do you have any thoughts why writes are so bad? It shouldn't be so..
> 
> It's not impossible that with the 4 KB write test I hit the 
> limits of the initiator system (Intel E6750 CPU, 2.66 GHz, 
> two cores). Some statistics I gathered during the 4 KB write test:
> Target: CPU load 0.5, 16500 mlx4-comp-0 interrupts per 
> second, same number of interrupts processed by each core (8250/s).
> Initiator: CPU load 1.0, 32850 mlx4-comp-0 interrupts per 
> second, all interrupts occurred on the same core.

Are you using connected mode IPoIB and setting the MTU to 4KB? Would
fragmentation of IPoIB drive up the interrupt rates?

> 
> Bart.
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------
> _______________________________________________
> Scst-devel mailing list
> Scst-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scst-devel
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/