linux-kernel - Re: Off topic: Numactl "distance" wrong

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 03 Apr 2009 22:16:03 +0200
From:	Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@...ia.fr>
To:	Chris Worley <worleys@...il.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Off topic: Numactl "distance" wrong

Chris Worley wrote:
> Sorry for an off topic, but I'm hoping somebody can point me in the
> right direction of where to direct this question...
>
> I have an Opteron system where I've seen the HW diagrams, and each of
> 4 sockets is directly connected (HT) to two other sockets, and two HT
> hops away from a third (i.e. a simple square topology, no X in the
> middle).
>
> Yet, "numactl --hardware" shows but one hop to each socket:
>
> # numactl --hardware
> ...
> node   0   1   2   3
>   0:  10  20  20  20
>   1:  20  10  20  20
>   2:  20  20  10  20
>   3:  20  20  20  10
>
> I know this is wrong.
>
> Who would be the right person (or list) to talk about this?
>   

IIRC, the motherboard/BIOS is supposed to report numa distances through
the PXM ACPI method. But I have never seen any opteron box do it
properly. So you just get 10 for "local" and 20 for "remote". Some
Itanium machines however report actual distances.

Brice

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/