| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:34:12 -0700 From: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com, Joel Becker <joel.becker@...cle.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [git patches] Ocfs2 updates for 2.6.30 On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 12:17:35PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Are they likely? Probably not. But that's not the point. The point is that > > you barely had time to compile that thing, much less give it any testing. > > Gaah. I pulled it anyway. Today, I just can't find it in me to care about > ocfs2 testing. Heh, thanks I guess :) > But please - keep this in mind. Even if the commit is old, when you rebase > it, you really do move it into a whole new world order. And yes, it > _usually_ works just fine. > > But to make sure, please do spend some time after setting up the tree to > make sure that what I get really is something that you know is what I want > to get. Point taken. Actually, the pre-rebased branch would have merged fine too, so I really just rebased because of old habit, which isn't a good reason, obviously. Next time, I'll rebase early enough so that we can get a reasonable amount of testing in. --Mark -- Mark Fasheh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists