[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 01:22:41 +1100
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/41] CacheFiles: Permit the page lock state to be monitored [ver #48]
On Saturday 04 April 2009 17:09:31 Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Saturday 04 April 2009 02:56:24 David Howells wrote:
> > Add a function to install a monitor on the page lock waitqueue for a particular
> > page, thus allowing the page being unlocked to be detected.
> >
> > This is used by CacheFiles to detect read completion on a page in the backing
> > filesystem so that it can then copy the data to the waiting netfs page.
>
> This is the only thing I'm still worried about in core code. The extra
> page flag (which is probably unusable for any other fs, due to its
> semantics) is an issue, but Andrew seemed like he was willing to spend
> *2* page flags on this, so I'm sure he's happy with 1.
Well that is to say it is not a such a bad concept to have... actually
we already have exactly this concept which is what should be used. Ie.
the filesystem's io completion handler.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists