[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 10:44:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Linux Kernel Developers List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Ext3 latency fixes
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >
> > I'm sorry, but that fsync thing _is_ a real-world case, and it's the one
> > that a hell of a lot more people care about than some idiotic sqlite
> > throughput issue.
>
> sqlite is just one case, I'm sure there are others. My point is that we
> should make sure that we don't regress on the throughput side. It's a
> trade off, we don't want throughput to fall through the floor either.
Jens, we _have_ regressed on the latency side. Everybody agrees.
Also, I may be odd, but I really do think latency is more important than
throughput. When my disk has latencies in the sub-milliseconds, I simply
do not think it is _acceptable_ to have hickups that affect my workload in
human-visible terms.
You say sqlite might regress by 4-5x. But Ted's numbers improve latencies
by mor than that. I haven't re-created them yet myself (still reading
email), but the point is, 4-5x may sound bad to you, but turn it around:
the current latency situation is _really_ bad. If we can fix it, we
definitely should.
> > Quite frankly, the fact that I can see _seconds_ of latencies with a
> > really good SSD is not acceptable. The fact that it is by design is even
> > less so.
>
> Agree, multi-second latencies is not acceptable.
I can literally send you strace output from my MUA, where it pauses for
ten seconds after it has written about 5kB (that's _kilobytes_) of data
and does a 'fsync'.
That's the load that Ted worked on and has a solution for.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists