linux-kernel - Re: Linux-2.6.29-git6 Compile Error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 4 Apr 2009 23:24:50 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Tarkan Erimer <tarkan.erimer@...knet.net.tr>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux-2.6.29-git6 Compile Error


* Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 07:47:01PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>  > 
>  > * Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
>  > 
>  > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 04:34:38PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>  > >  > 
>  > >  > (Cc: added)
>  > > 
>  > > See 199785eac892a1fa1b71cc22bec58e8b156d9311
>  > > Steven picked up in this build failure _months_ ago in -next,
>  > > which caused me to regenerate the cpufreq tree so that the build failure
>  > > wouldn't get introduced to mainline.
>  > > 
>  > > Then the x86-merge comes along, and steamrollers over it.
>  > 
>  > hmmm ... there certainly was no build failure observable here. 
>  > Which commit caused the problem? 199785eac8 went in via your 
>  > tree, not the x86 tree.
> 
> The commits that moved the include file around reverted the 
> changes from 199785eac8.

ah. That was indeed my bad - sorry about that. Should we have 
applied that fix to the x86 tree or did it only make sense after
the merge?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/