linux-kernel - Re: cross-compilers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 7 Apr 2009 20:03:31 -0500
From:	Robin Holt <holt@....com>
To:	Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: cross-compilers

Don't know if this answers your problem, but I use the tools from
emdebian and they do not suffer from the problems you list below.

Good Luck,
Robin

On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 06:39:21PM -0600, Alex Chiang wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> I've been using your cross-compilers here:
> 
> 	http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/cross-compilers/
> 
> for a long time now, but they're starting to suffer from a bit of
> neglect.
> 
> For example, the ia64 bundle, which used gcc 3.4.5 is now finally
> too old to build 2.6.30-rc1, because of a gcc bug related to
> labels.
> 
> Some of the newer bundles which use gcc 4.1.0 don't work because
> of a check in:
> 
> 	include/linux/compiler-gcc4.h
> 
> So my question is, do you still use those tools hosted on
> kernel.org or do you have a new solution these days?
> 
> If you have a new solution, I'd like to hear it, because I found
> those cross-compilers pretty useful, as I'm sure others did.
> 
> I spent most of yesterday fiddling about and managed to build an
> x86_64 host, ia64 target, gcc 4.2.3, glibc 2.3.6 bundle, and it
> all seems to work.
> 
> Is this something you're interested in? I could send you my
> tarball (and slowly work on some of the other archs).
> 
> If so, what were the crosstool build options you used? I'm
> specifically wondering about:
> 
> 	- should I am for lowest common denominator host or are
> 	  you ok with x86_64 host
> 	
> 	- did you statically link the toolchain? or is it
> 	  dynamically linked?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> /ac
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/