linux-kernel - Re: Implementing NVMHCI...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 12 Apr 2009 00:25:27 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Grant Grundler <grundler@...gle.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	Linux IDE mailing list <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: Implementing NVMHCI...

> We've abstract the DMA mapping/SG list handling enough that the
> block size should make no more difference than it does for the
> MTU size of a network.

You need to start managing groups of pages in the vm and keeping them
together and writing them out together and paging them together even if
one of them is dirty and the other isn't. You have to deal with cases
where a process forks and the two pages are dirtied one in each but still
have to be written together.

Alternatively you go for read-modify-write (nasty performance hit
especially for RAID or a log structured fs).

Yes you can do it but it sure won't be pretty with a conventional fs.
Some of the log structured file systems have no problems with this and
some kinds of journalling can help but for a typical block file system
it'll suck.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/