linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Add MCE support to KVM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:26:03 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add MCE support to KVM

On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 03:25:19PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> >>Right, but we can allocate the maximum number, no?  it's a fairly small 
> >>amount of memory.
> >>    
> >
> >There are 255 banks worst case which need upto 4 (in theory 5) MSRs each
> >
> >  
> 
> That's 8KB, which would normally not be allocated.  But I think we can 
> live with it.
> 
> Do we actually need to support 255 banks? 

Probably not. Current CPUs all have a single digit number.

e.g. 64 would be plenty for now.

> Or can we support a smaller 
> number transparently?

Not transparently. In theory software can hardcode that for cpu model X bank Y 
is available and does Z. Software doesn't have too, Intel provides a bank 
independent way to report errors too, but we don't know if everyone uses it.
Linux doesn't rely on bank numbers on Intel at least.

-Andi
-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/