lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:59:25 +0100
From:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To:	Ed Tomlinson <edt@....ca>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Subject: Re: How movable is zone movable?

On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 11:29:09AM -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> How dependable should zone movable be? 

It should be quite dependable for resizing the static hugepage pool,
particularly if you are willing to wait. However, with latest
libhugetlbfs, the hugeadm utility still has a --hard option incase you
need to wait a long time for the resize to occur.

> After a boot kvm is able to get enough hugepages to 
> back the session.  After a day or two it becomes a lot less predictable.  Sometimes it will swap out for 30 seconds
> and then succeed other times it will fail. 

Unfortunately, that sounds about right. If there is significant
fragmentation, it takes time to find out a contiguous area that can be
reclaimed. mlock() if it's a factor will complicate things further.

> Interestingly, it sometimes works if I cancel the kvm session after
> it tells me it cannot allocate the hugepages and immediatly restart.  It there some way to determine what
> is not respecting zone moveable? 

Ok, that is odd. Are base pages being mlocked()? If they are, they could be
the problem as the patches to move those pages around were never merged.

> Or is zone moveable just a suggestion and not expected to really be 
> moveable?
> 

They are expected to be movable, but pages that get locked do not get
moved at the moment.

> I have the following set in sysctl.conf
> 
> # huge_pages with movablecore set to 3G
> kernel.shmmax = 8589934592
> vm.nr_hugepages = 128
> vm.nr_overcommit_hugepages = 1408
> vm.hugepages_treat_as_movable = 1
> vm.hugetlb_shm_group = 1005

How big did you make the movable zone and what is the hugepage size? I'm
guessing the hugepage size is 2MB but no harm in being sure. If that's
the case, the movable zone should be at least 2816MB to maximise success
rates when resizing.

> 
> This is with any recient kernel release (2.6.28 and later)
> 

That's pretty recent. /proc/vmstat will also tell you how many
allocations are actually failing.

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ