linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:57:27 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	fweisbec@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:43:17 +1000

> Dave, arch/sparc/include/asm/atomic_32.h should really include
> asm/system.h since xchg is used in there.

That's true.

But atomic.h is not the proper place to obtain xchg() from, which is
asm/system.h, and that's what debug_locks.h needs to include if it
needs to use xchg().

This is why the s390 build broke in precisely the same way.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/