linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/30] cr: core stuff

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:52:35 -0400
From:	Oren Laadan <orenl@...columbia.edu>
To:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
CC:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, xemul@...allels.com,
	dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@...e.hu, hch@...radead.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/30] cr: core stuff

Hi,

Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Alexey Dobriyan (adobriyan@...il.com):
> 
> Hi Alexey,
> 
> as far as I can see, the main differences between this patch and the
> equivalent in Oren's tree are:
> 
> 1. kernel auto-selects container init to freeze

Actually, this eliminates the possibility to checkpoint a subtree of
tasks, which (under some obvious constraints) can be a handy feature.

> 2. kernel freezes tasks

IMHO better to do it in userspace - that way userspace can accomplish
other tasks while tasks are frozen, such as snapshot the filesystem,
or block/unblock the network.

Is there a good argument to do it kernel ?

> 3. no objhash taking references
> 4. no hbuf
> 5. always require CAP_SYS_ADMIN

I'm now convinced (thanks, Serge!) that it's better not to require
this unless we strictly have to.

Oren.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/