linux-kernel - Re: USB storage no-boot regression (bisected)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:48:50 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
CC:	Linux USB kernel mailing list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: USB storage no-boot regression (bisected)

Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:30:28 -0400
> Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:
> 
>> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>>> This change just made it go faster enough for you to be out of luck;
>>> fundamentally your userland needs to wait if the device it wants is
>>> not there. 
>> All these drivers are in-kernel, and the root device is passed via 
>> command line.  There is no userland at that point, that needs to wait.
> 
> ok fair; but that does not change that the kernel does not know if a
> device is coming.
> Yes that sucks; sadly USB is just this way, you don't know when no new
> devices will come from a certain bus.

Perhaps -- but I can say that kernels <= 2.6.27 booted with 100% 
reliability.

Now, Kernels >= 2.6.28 always fail.

The ONLY variable is the kernel.

	Jeff



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/