lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:54:40 +0530
From:	Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@...e.de>
To:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] [RFC] make hd_struct->in_flight atomic to avoid diskstat corruption

The disk statistics exported to userspace through proc and sysfs are not
protected by locks to avoid performance overhead. Since most of the statistics
are maintained in the per_cpu struct disk_stats, the chances of them getting
corrupted is negligible. But the in_flight counter, that records the no of
requests currently in progress is not per-cpu. This increases the chance of it
getting corrupted. And corruption of this value would result in visibly
distorted statistics such as negative in_flight. This can be avoided by making
this field atomic.

Signed-off-by: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@...e.de>

---

diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 07ab754..c295deb 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -1013,12 +1013,15 @@ static inline void add_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req)
 static void part_round_stats_single(int cpu, struct hd_struct *part,
 				    unsigned long now)
 {
+	int in_flight;
+
 	if (now == part->stamp)
 		return;
 
-	if (part->in_flight) {
+	in_flight = atomic_read(&part->in_flight);
+	if (in_flight) {
 		__part_stat_add(cpu, part, time_in_queue,
-				part->in_flight * (now - part->stamp));
+				in_flight * (now - part->stamp));
 		__part_stat_add(cpu, part, io_ticks, (now - part->stamp));
 	}
 	part->stamp = now;
diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
index a9ec910..9436991 100644
--- a/block/genhd.c
+++ b/block/genhd.c
@@ -1028,7 +1028,7 @@ static int diskstats_show(struct seq_file *seqf, void *v)
 			   part_stat_read(hd, merges[1]),
 			   (unsigned long long)part_stat_read(hd, sectors[1]),
 			   jiffies_to_msecs(part_stat_read(hd, ticks[1])),
-			   hd->in_flight,
+			   atomic_read(&hd->in_flight),
 			   jiffies_to_msecs(part_stat_read(hd, io_ticks)),
 			   jiffies_to_msecs(part_stat_read(hd, time_in_queue))
 			);
diff --git a/fs/partitions/check.c b/fs/partitions/check.c
index 99e33ef..ae1f55a 100644
--- a/fs/partitions/check.c
+++ b/fs/partitions/check.c
@@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ ssize_t part_stat_show(struct device *dev,
 		part_stat_read(p, merges[WRITE]),
 		(unsigned long long)part_stat_read(p, sectors[WRITE]),
 		jiffies_to_msecs(part_stat_read(p, ticks[WRITE])),
-		p->in_flight,
+		atomic_read(&p->in_flight),
 		jiffies_to_msecs(part_stat_read(p, io_ticks)),
 		jiffies_to_msecs(part_stat_read(p, time_in_queue)));
 }
diff --git a/include/linux/genhd.h b/include/linux/genhd.h
index 634c530..5921400 100644
--- a/include/linux/genhd.h
+++ b/include/linux/genhd.h
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ struct hd_struct {
 	int make_it_fail;
 #endif
 	unsigned long stamp;
-	int in_flight;
+	atomic_t in_flight;
 #ifdef	CONFIG_SMP
 	struct disk_stats *dkstats;
 #else
@@ -321,16 +321,16 @@ static inline void free_part_stats(struct hd_struct *part)
 
 static inline void part_inc_in_flight(struct hd_struct *part)
 {
-	part->in_flight++;
+	atomic_inc(&part->in_flight);
 	if (part->partno)
-		part_to_disk(part)->part0.in_flight++;
+		atomic_inc(&part_to_disk(part)->part0.in_flight);
 }
 
 static inline void part_dec_in_flight(struct hd_struct *part)
 {
-	part->in_flight--;
+	atomic_dec(&part->in_flight);
 	if (part->partno)
-		part_to_disk(part)->part0.in_flight--;
+		atomic_dec(&part_to_disk(part)->part0.in_flight);
 }
 
 /* block/blk-core.c */

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ