linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: Introduce APIs for waiting multi events

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 16 Apr 2009 19:59:53 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: Introduce APIs for waiting multi events

On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:18:48AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> 
> Impact: make kernel has APIs for waiting multi events
> 
> Based on code in the RCU, the simple waiting-multi-events
> algorithm may do not serve RCU only.
> 
> Introduce 5 APIs for waiting multi events
> 
> start scheduling events:  ref_completion_get_init()
> schedule one event:       ref_completion_get()
> end scheduling events:    ref_completion_put_init()
> 
> any event is finished:    ref_completion_put()
> 
> waiting scheduled events: ref_completion_wait()

Interesting API!  What other uses for it have you found?

One question down below.

							Thanx, Paul

> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/include/linux/completion.h b/include/linux/completion.h
> index 4a6b604..86c8236 100644
> --- a/include/linux/completion.h
> +++ b/include/linux/completion.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>   * See kernel/sched.c for details.
>   */
> 
> +#include <asm/atomic.h>
>  #include <linux/wait.h>
> 
>  /**
> @@ -98,5 +99,44 @@ extern void complete_all(struct completion *);
>   */
>  #define INIT_COMPLETION(x)	((x).done = 0)
> 
> +/*
> + * wait all references are put, or wait multi events finished in other words
> + * ref_completion_get_init() called before the struct is used or reused.
> + * ref_completion_put_init() called after all ref_completion_get()s called.
> + * ref_completion_wait()     waiting until all ref_completion_put()s and
> + *                           the ref_completion_put_init() are called.
> + */
> +struct ref_completion {
> +	atomic_t ref;
> +	struct completion wait;
> +};
> +
> +static inline void ref_completion_get_init(struct ref_completion *rc)
> +{
> +	atomic_set(&rc->ref, 1);
> +	init_completion(&rc->wait);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void ref_completion_get(struct ref_completion *rc)
> +{
> +	atomic_inc(&rc->ref);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void ref_completion_put(struct ref_completion *rc)
> +{
> +	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rc->ref))
> +		complete_all(&rc->wait);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void ref_completion_put_init(struct ref_completion *rc)
> +{
> +	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rc->ref))
> +		complete_all(&rc->wait);
> +}

Looks to me that ref_completion_put() and ref_completion_put_init() are
identical.  What is the story with that?

> +static inline void ref_completion_wait(struct ref_completion *rc)
> +{
> +	wait_for_completion(&rc->wait);
> +}
> 
>  #endif
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/