linux-kernel - Re: Proposal: make RAID6 code optional

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:50:07 +0200
From:	Andre Noll <maan@...temlinux.org>
To:	Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@....de>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>,
	Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@...iler.org>,
	Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>,
	Prakash Punnoor <prakash@...noor.de>,
	Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, neilb@...e.de
Subject: Re: Proposal: make RAID6 code optional

On 20:31, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Really? Easier than keeping only two 256-byte arrays for exp() and
> > log() and use these at runtime to populate the (dynamically allocated)
> > 64K GF multiplication table? That seems to be really simple and would
> > still shave off 64K of kernel memory for raid5-only users.
> >
> > Andre
> 
> Oh, you mean when the first raid6 device is started and not when the
> module is loaded.

Yes, that's what I was trying to say.

Andre
-- 
The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)