lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:05:28 -0400
From:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: Re-implement MCE log ring buffer as per-CPU ring buffer

On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:39:29AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > > it is processed before I can release the code.
> > > 
> > > When will it be merged by mainline kernel? Do you have a plan?
> > 
> > Patent applications tend to be measured in years. Also I'm not sure
> > we really want patented algorithms in the kernel anyways if it can
> > be avoided. So the patent probably makes it impractical to use this
> > thing at all.
> 
> Once it is filed then I can post it, I do not need to wait till it is 
> done.

Simply preparing a patent application for filing can take a
non-trivial amount of time.  I'd suggest that you should ask your
patent attorney whether he is planning on filing internationally, or
just in the US.  

If he (or she) is only planning only in the US, unlike the rest of the
world, the US is not a first-to-file, so as long as you have proof of
when you invented it --- for example, getting a description of your
invention notarized --- you might be able to get clearance from your
legal department to submit the patch while the patent application is
getting prepared.

Reference:
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_to_file_and_first_to_invent

If your attorney is not willing to do this, all I can suggest is that
you ask him to ask his opposite numbers at other open source companies
how they handle this situation at a future Linux Foundation Legal
Summit.  I can assure you there are far more rational ways of handling
this than forcing people to wait until the patent application is
actually filed.

> And what the hell do you mean about not using patents?? We have several 
> patents in the kernel. Have you ever heard of the Open Invention Network?
> 
>  http://www.openinventionnetwork.com/
> 
> This patent will go under the Open Source patent pool to help 
> protect against patent attacks against Linux, et. al.
> 
> Yes, the Open Source community can file their own patents. The more 
> patents owned by the Open Source community, the better.

No argument here.  It's just that there are better ways of doing
things than waiting until after the patent application is fully
drafted, all of the engineering drawings are done, the language of
patent claims are fine-tuned, etc., all of which can take a long, LONG
time, depending on how busy your patent attorney and his (or her)
staff might happen to be.

      		       	    	 	- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ