linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [13/16] POISON: The high level memory error handler in the VM II

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:27:36 -0400
From:	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
To:	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	"hugh@...itas.com" <hugh@...itas.com>,
	"npiggin@...e.de" <npiggin@...e.de>,
	"riel@...hat.com" <riel@...hat.com>,
	"lee.schermerhorn@...com" <lee.schermerhorn@...com>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [13/16] POISON: The high level memory error handler in
 the VM II

On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 17:05 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 04:36:55PM +0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > I'll have to read harder next week, the FS invalidatepage may expect
> > > > truncate to be the only caller.
> > > 
> > > If direct de-dirty is hard for some pages, how about just ignore them?
> > 
> > You mean just ignoring it for the pages where it is hard?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > Yes that is what it is essentially doing right now. But at least
> > some dirty pages need to be handled because most user space
> > pages tend to be dirty.
> 
> Sure.  There are three types of dirty pages:
> 
> A. now dirty, can be de-dirty in the current code
> B. now dirty, cannot be de-dirty
> C. now dirty and writeback, cannot be de-dirty
> 
> I mean B and C can be handled in one single place - the block layer.
> 
> If B is hard to be de-dirtied now, ignore them for now and they will
> eventually be going to IO and become C.
> 
> > > There are the PG_writeback pages anyway. We can inject code to
> > > intercept them at the last stage of IO request dispatching.
> > 
> > That would require adding error out code through all the file systems,
> > right?
> 
> Not necessarily. The file systems deal with buffer head, extend map
> and bios, they normally won't touch the poisoned page content at all.
> 

They often do when zeroing parts of the page that straddle i_size.  At
least for btrfs its enough to change grab_cache_page and find_get_page
(and friends) to do the poison magic, along with the functions uses by
write_cache_pages.

-chris


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/