lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:37:52 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, dwmw2@...radead.org,
	mingo@...e.hu, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	weidong.han@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Intel IOMMU Pass Through Support

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:19:57 -0700
> Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com> wrote:
> 
>> The patch adds kernel parameter intel_iommu=pt to set up pass through mode in
>> context mapping entry. This disables DMAR in linux kernel; but KVM still runs on
>> VT-d and interrupt remapping still works.
>>
>> In this mode, kernel uses swiotlb for DMA API functions but other VT-d
>> functionalities are enabled for KVM. KVM always uses multi level translation
>> page table in VT-d. By default, pass though mode is disabled in kernel.
>>
>> This is useful when people don't want to enable VT-d DMAR in kernel but still
>> want to use KVM and interrupt remapping for reasons like DMAR performance
>> concern or debug purpose.
>>
> 
> The patch is now in linux-next and broke my build.
> 
> arch/x86/built-in.o: In function `iommu_setup':
> arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c:215: undefined reference to `iommu_pass_through'
> arch/x86/built-in.o: In function `pci_swiotlb_init':
> arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c:74: undefined reference to `iommu_pass_through'
> 
> Because iommu_pass_through is defined in drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c and
> 
> # CONFIG_DMAR is not set
> 
> I'll need to cook up some local hack to work around that.
> 

Patch just went to linux-next mailing list (but should have also
gone to lkml):

http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=124113213400748&w=2


> 
> Also, the patch in linux-next (but not the one which I'm replying to
> here does:
> 
> : --- a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
> : +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
> : @@ -160,6 +160,8 @@ again:
> :         return page_address(page);
> :  }
> :  
> : +extern int iommu_pass_through;
> : +
> 
> Which is wrong and unnecessary - the variable was already declared in a
> header file.
> 
> scripts/checkpatch.pl would have warned you about this error, but
> apparently neither you nor the people who reviewed or merged the patch
> bother to use it.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ