lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 1 May 2009 15:56:38 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>,
	Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	Remis Lima Baima <remis.developer@...glemail.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/27] asm-generic: add legacy I/O header files

On Friday 01 May 2009, Alan Cox wrote:
> They shouldn't define it - we want those invalid cases to error. Stick
> CLOCK_TICK_RATE in the depths of the x86 arch includes and then we can
> fix the other cases properly. Either the device has an independant clock
> of the same frequency (some watchdogs do this), it relies upon a
> motherboard timer in which case the platform can define CLOCK_TICK_RATE
> (or a better name for it), or it doesn't have any meaning in which case
> we *want* it not to compile.

I just noticed that linux/jiffies.h does not compile without a definition
of CLOCK_TICK_RATE, so that's probably why every architecture defines it.
If I find a way to remove that dependency, I can simply leave out the
CLOCK_TICK_RATE from the generic header. I have not yet understood the
relation of jiffies to CLOCK_TICK_RATE, but my suspicion is that it's
not good for architectures that do not have a clock tick.

	Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ