| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 13:28:18 -0700 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com> Cc: fengguang.wu@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, mpm@...enic.com, clameter@....com, mingo@...e.hu, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] use GFP_NOFS in kernel_event() On Fri, 01 May 2009 14:11:34 -0400 Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 14:10 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:19:33 -0400 > > Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com> wrote: > > > > > > Somebody was going to fix this for us via lockdep annotation. > > > > > > > > <adds randomly-chosen cc> > > > > > > I really didn't forget this, but I can't figure out how to recreate it, > > > so I don't know if my logic in the patch is sound. The patch certainly > > > will shut up the complaint. > > > > Do you think we should merge the GFP_NOFS workaround for 2.6.30 and > > fix all up nicely for 2.6.31? > > I'm all for it for 2.6.30 OK. > although the patch really should have been > the one that gets the audit use case too at > > >From me on Mar 18 Subject [PATCH] make inotify event handles use > GFP_NOFS > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/3/18/310 I queued that as an incremental to Wu Fengguang's patch, because inotify-use-gfp_nofs-in-kernel_event-to-work-around-a-lockdep-false-positive.patch has a longer changelog ;) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists