linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Add CONFIG_VFAT_NO_CREATE_WITH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 04 May 2009 08:59:14 -0700
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, tridge@...ba.org,
	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>,
	Ogawa Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add CONFIG_VFAT_NO_CREATE_WITH_LONGNAMES option

Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:

> On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 09:08 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 07:39:19AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> > On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 07:21:19AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> > > Bringing the patch to a public mailing list is a waste of time until
>> > > there's a reliable description of the problem you're trying to solve.
>> > 
>> > Please see the original patch.  It does describes what it is doing.
>> 
>> "What", but not "Why".  Which is only acceptable in GNU changelogs ;-)
>
> Please understand the "Why" is a sticky subject that we can't and won't
> discuss in a public forum.  However, we believe the maintainers
> understand the "Why" of it well enough to consider whether or not to
> include such a patch.  The "What" should be pretty clear from the patch
> description.  The "How" is a technical question that can be discussed
> here.

If the "Why" can not be discussed then you don't have a "Why" you can
stand behind.

If you don't have a "Why" you can stand behind the "Why" sucks and does
not appear to be an appropriate justification for a patch applied to
a public piece of code.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/