linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/6] tracing: increase size of number of possible events

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 04 May 2009 17:05:20 +0800
From:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] tracing: increase size of number of possible events

(Sorry for the delayed reply)

Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Hi Li,
> 
> 
> On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, Li Zefan wrote:
> 
>> Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>> On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, Li Zefan wrote:
>>>>> console 1:
>>>>>  # cat /debug/tracing/trace_pipe
>>>>>
>>>>> console 2:
>>>>> while (1) {
>>>>> 	insmod trace-events-sample.ko
>>>>> 	echo foo_bar > /debug/tracing/set_event
>>>>> 	rmmod trace-events-sample.ko
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> I got this immediately:
>>>>>
>>>>> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000006f
>>>>> IP: [<c05210f3>] bstr_printf+0x2ce/0x302
>>>>> ...
>>>>> Call Trace:
>>>>>  [<c0476d12>] ? trace_seq_bprintf+0x28/0x41
>>>>>  [<c0477569>] ? trace_bprint_print+0x58/0x6c
>>>>>  [<c0472ffc>] ? print_trace_line+0x2c5/0x2df
>>>>>  [<c0428a41>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x85/0xa0
>>>>>  [<c04758cf>] ? tracing_read_pipe+0x118/0x191
>>>>>  [<c04757b7>] ? tracing_read_pipe+0x0/0x191
>>>>>  [<c04b09f9>] ? vfs_read+0x8f/0x136
>>>>>  [<c04b0da3>] ? sys_read+0x40/0x65
>>>>>  [<c0402a68>] ? sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x36
>>>>>
>>>>> (We can even get other crashes..)
>>>>>
>>>> Can you send me your full bootlog and config. I'm not able to reproduce 
>>>> this.
>>> And the SHA1 of the HEAD of the git repo you are using.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>> the HEAD: 9ce5424d75e56891905b77d1589924765e62059a + this patch
>>
>> (I commented out "hi" from the sample module)
> 
> I found that commenting out the "hi" too helped in causing races.
> 
>> I think it's because "type" is wrapped back to 0. I changed the test script
>> like this:
>>
>> while (foo_bar.id < 65536)
>> {
>> 	insmod trace-events-sample.ko
>> 	rmmod trace-events-sample.ko
>> }
>>
>> for ((; ;))
>> {
>>         insmod /home/lizf/linux-2.6-tip/samples/trace_events/*.ko
>>         echo trace-events-sample:foo_bar > /mnt/tracing/set_event
>>         sleep 1
>>         cat /mnt/tracing/trace
>>         rmmod /home/lizf/linux-2.6-tip/samples/trace_events/*.ko
>> }
>>
> 
> Could you try my git repo with my latest changes?
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-2.6-trace.git
> 
>  branch: rfc/debugfs
> 

The bug won't be triggered with your latest changes, but it has nothing
to do with the debugfs patch, it's because this patch:
	"tracing/events: reuse trace event ids after overflow"

But that patch just hides the bug not fixes it.. I thought I explained
the bug clearly. :(

I think the bug is triggered because a wrong trace_event->trace() is called.


Before the above patch:
   id overflowed
 =>foo_bar.id == 6 == TRACE_BPRINT
 =>echo foo_bar > set_event
 =>sleep N secs
 =>rmmod sample
 =>cat trace
   =>trace_bprint_event->trace() is called!!
     =>oops!!!


After the above patch:

   Suppose id 0 ~ 65534 are used, only 65535 is left, and we have 2 different
   sample module trace_event subsystems foo and bar.
 =>insmod foo.ko, and foo.id == 65535
 =>echo foo > set_event
 =>sleep N secs
 =>rmmod foo.ko
 =>insmod bar.ko, and bar.id == 65535
 =>cat trace
   =>bar->trace() will be called on events which were generated by foo!

So is it possible/sane to discard corresponding events from ring buffer when
we unload a module?

Correct me if I'm wrong..

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/