[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 12:44:01 +0200
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
Li Hong <lihong.hi@...il.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: use memdup_user()
Am Dienstag, 5. Mai 2009 08:11:57 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> On Mon, 4 May 2009 16:01:51 +0200 Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org> wrote:
> > I want people to be forced to think about memory allocations.
> > We had endless trouble during 2.4 with storage deadlocking.
> > We simply need full control of this.
>
> thou-shalt-use-GFP_NOFS is a very common pattern in many filesystems.
> And thou-shalt-use-GFP_NOIO is a very common pattern in block drivers.
USB drivers are interface level yet some functions, reset and power
management, are on a device level. As it is unpredictable whether
a driver will share a device with a storage driver, all USB drivers as far as
these functions are concerned must be considered block device drivers.
That's the reason GFP_NOIO is so prevalent in USB.
> I wonder how hard it would be to add runtime debugging checks? If
I'd prefer compile time checks. Ideally we'd annotate a function with an
attribute making the compiler barf if copy_to/from_user or an inappropriate
kmalloc is used. It can't be perfect due to function pointers, but it would
be a good start.
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists