[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 13:30:53 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To: gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: p80211wext.c: possible problem with IW_ENCODE_ALG_WEP
The file drivers/staging/wlan-ng/p80211wext.c contains the following code:
(starting at line 1490 in a recent linux-next)
if (!(ext->alg & IW_ENCODE_ALG_WEP)) {
pr_debug("asked to set a non wep key :(");
return -EINVAL;
}
The reference to IW_ENCODE_ALG_WEP seems to refer to the following
definitions in include/linux/wireless.h
/* struct iw_encode_ext ->alg */
#define IW_ENCODE_ALG_NONE 0
#define IW_ENCODE_ALG_WEP 1
#define IW_ENCODE_ALG_TKIP 2
#define IW_ENCODE_ALG_CCMP 3
#define IW_ENCODE_ALG_PMK 4
#define IW_ENCODE_ALG_AES_CMAC 5
But if the alg field returns true for a bit and with IW_ENCODE_ALG_WEP,
then it would also return true for a bit and with IW_ENCODE_ALG_CCMP and
IW_ENCODE_ALG_AES_CMAC. Is this what is intended, or should the test be
encoded in another way?
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists