linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Add CONFIG_VFAT_NO_CREATE_WITH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 05 May 2009 17:00:08 -0400
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, tridge@...ba.org,
	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>,
	Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ogawa Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add CONFIG_VFAT_NO_CREATE_WITH_LONGNAMES option

On Tue, 05 May 2009 08:35:27 PDT, "Paul E. McKenney" said:

> http://books.google.com/books?id=6je0tPcGMzYC&pg=PT822&lpg=PT822&dq=Videotron
ics+v.+Bend+Electronics,+586+F.Supp.+478,+481+(D.+Nev.+1984)&source=bl&ots=ccxO
5np_uQ&sig=Q0wj4k5uCpMiZybAQe12JlHhh0A&hl=en&ei=Z1kASu2ZJ8eLtgehupyNBw&sa=X&oi=
book_result&ct=result&resnum=2#PPT822,M1
> 
> Dated 2005, cites a 1988 case in footnote 28.  Also claims that:

That would be the same Neundorfer case I found.

> Copyright Office II Compendium of Copyright Office Practices lists
> acceptable variants to the C in a circle, including "(c)".

http://www.copyright.gov/compendium/ - I ain't seeing it in there anyplace?
Every occurrence of "(c)" is in either a USC or CFR citation. But of course
that only shows the two chapters modified since 1998. Yee-hah. :)

I suspect it's one of those dark corners of the legal system that nobody
really wants to explore, because there might be a Balrog hiding in the depths
(sort of like the question "Which clause/theory of copyright law authorizes
the copy of a webpage you make while downloading it to read it?" ;)




Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped