linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] integrity: lsm audit rule matching fix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 6 May 2009 09:14:51 +1000 (EST)
From:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	david safford <safford@...son.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] integrity: lsm audit rule matching fix

On Tue, 5 May 2009, Mimi Zohar wrote:

> An audit subsystem change replaced AUDIT_EQUAL with Audit_equal.
> Update calls to security_filter_rule_init()/match() to reflect
> the change.
> 
> Index: security-testing-2.6/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> ===================================================================
> --- security-testing-2.6.orig/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> +++ security-testing-2.6/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_m
>  	if ((rule->flags & IMA_UID) && rule->uid != tsk->cred->uid)
>  		return false;
>  	for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) {
> -		int rc;
> +		int rc = 0;

Why did you change this?

-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/