[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 19:38:12 -0400
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
david safford <safford@...son.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] integrity: lsm audit rule matching fix
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 09:14 +1000, James Morris wrote:
> On Tue, 5 May 2009, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>
> > An audit subsystem change replaced AUDIT_EQUAL with Audit_equal.
> > Update calls to security_filter_rule_init()/match() to reflect
> > the change.
> >
> > Index: security-testing-2.6/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- security-testing-2.6.orig/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> > +++ security-testing-2.6/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> > @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_m
> > if ((rule->flags & IMA_UID) && rule->uid != tsk->cred->uid)
> > return false;
> > for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) {
> > - int rc;
> > + int rc = 0;
>
> Why did you change this?
Based on a reported compiler warning error.
Mimi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists