[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 12:05:19 +0800
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To: David VomLehn <dvomlehn@...co.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, greg@...ah.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
arjan@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] initdev:kernel: USB and SCSI block init device
notification, v3
2009/5/5 David VomLehn <dvomlehn@...co.com>:
> On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 11:55:39PM -0400, Ming Lei wrote:
>> On Fri, 1 May 2009 19:30:00 -0700
>> David VomLehn <dvomlehn@...co.com> wrote:
>>
>> > From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu
>> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
>> > index 6f51ca4..735b061 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> ...
>> > @@ -1834,6 +1834,7 @@ static int do_scan_async(void *_data)
>> > struct async_scan_data *data = _data;
>> > do_scsi_scan_host(data->shost);
>> > scsi_finish_async_scan(data);
>> > + initdev_probe_done(BOOTDEV_BLOCK_MASK);
>>
>> Which code are waiting for the block device's probe done?
>
> None yet. That remains to be done.
>
Would you mind submitting the code path of waitting for probe done to allow a
intact review? Without the waitting code, it is a a little difficult
to undersand or verify
your patch, IMHO.
Thanks
--
Lei Ming
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists