linux-kernel - Re: [patch] security: rename ptrace_may_access => ptrace_access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 7 May 2009 11:19:17 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [patch] security: rename ptrace_may_access =>
	ptrace_access_check

On 05/07, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> Subject: security: rename ptrace_may_access => ptrace_access_check
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
>
> The ->ptrace_may_access() methods are named confusingly - the real 
> ptrace_may_access() returns a bool, while these security checks have 
> a retval convention.
> 
> Rename it to ptrace_access_check, to reduce the confusion factor.

Great. Now we can rename (and fix the callers of) ptrace.c:ptrace_may_access()
accordingly.

But,

> -static inline int security_ptrace_may_access(struct task_struct *child,
> +static inline int security_ptrace_access_check(struct task_struct *child,
>  					     unsigned int mode)

You seem to forgot to update the callers of this helper.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/