lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 7 May 2009 10:20:48 -0700
From:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com>
To:	Karl Hiramoto <karl@...amoto.org>
Cc:	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	"ath9k-devel@...ts.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@...ts.ath9k.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Gabor Juhos <juhosg@...nwrt.org>,
	Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] New kernel recommendations for ath9k

On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Karl Hiramoto <karl@...amoto.org> wrote:
> Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>
>> For those not subscribed to the ath9k wiki on wireless.kernel.org [1]
>> (which we recommend you do if you're a user) here's a quick note to
>> let you know our latest kernel recommendations for using ath9k:
>>
>>  *  >= 2.6.27.22
>>  *  >= 2.6.28.10
>>  *  2.6.29
>>
>> If you want 802.11n support or AP support you'll want at least 2.6.29.
>> If you happen to have one of our new 1x1 AR9285 devices (all AR9285
>> devices are 1x1) then you'll need at least 2.6.29. If you want to
>> start using ath9k on APs with AHB you will need at least 2.6.30 (still
>> in RC series).
>>
>> As usual if you happen to be stuck on older kernels for one reason or
>> another you can always use compat-wireless [2] and if that happens to
>> be a little too bleeding edge we have now compat-wireless releases for
>> stable kernel releases, starting as of the 2.6.30-rc series [3].
>>
>>  Luis
>>
>> [1] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k
>> [2] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download
>> [3] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download/stable
>>
>
> Thanks for the update.  If i want to use multiple AP's with Ath9k it it
> still best to use wireless-testing?  Is multiple AP support in 2.6.30-rc
> series net-next or wireless-next?

Yeah wireless-testing is best for that. I should also mention that if
you want to use AP mode you want to be at least on 2.6.29 (your own
kernel, not the compat-wireless one) if you care about Power Save
buffering on the AP as otherwise even if you use a compat-wireless
with code from > 2.6.29 those frames will be dropped. IIRC its due to
the way we use skb->cb for this and there not being a clean way to
backport this (so we just drop them).

  Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ