| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 09:11:55 +0200 From: Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@...il.com> To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Matt Price <moptop99@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...onice.net>, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, tuxonice-devel@...ts.tuxonice.net Subject: Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote: > On Thu 2009-05-07 20:57:44, Fabio Comolli wrote: ... >> >> Well, if I may jump in I suggest you start with the full-memory image >> functionality. This is in my opinion the biggest advantage in tuxonice >> vs. uswsusp. > > Neither tuxonice nor swsusp can write full-memory image (it is mostly > impossible to do in unlikely case of all memory is consumed by > kmalloc). Now, tuxonice can produce bigger images than swsusp... > Pavel, please. (u)swsusp can save images up to half the physical memory IIRC; with toi I used to easily save 980MB of image on a 1GB laptop. You can't honestly compare the two things. > Rafael had short patch for similar efect some time ago, but we could > not find anyone to really review it... > Pavel > -- Regards, Fabio > (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek > (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists