linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/13] RFC ONLY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 09 May 2009 00:49:56 +0300
From:	Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
To:	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	kdb@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/13] RFC ONLY - kdb for kgdb

On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 16:23 -0500, Jason Wessel wrote:
> This patch series is a request for comments on several levels.
> 
> 1) Do people find kdb useful? (See * and **)
> 2) Would kdb folks be willing to use it if it was a front end to kgdb?
> 3) Does kdb have a future in the mainline kernel?
> 4) Is this a reasonable approach to have some level of
>    unification to end up with a more robust kernel debugger?
> 
> * This is not meant to be a religious war
> 

I am just a ordinary user of linux, but I want to say that I enjoyed the
kdb back when I used it. I really would like to see that in kernel.


But it would be even better to see a kdb over ethernet first (I have no
serial port in my notebook....)

Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/