linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fix for sched_clock() when using jiffies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 8 May 2009 16:01:42 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Ron <ron@...ian.org>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix for sched_clock() when using jiffies

On Sat, 9 May 2009 05:34:44 +0930
Ron <ron@...ian.org> wrote:

>  
> Account for the initial offset to the jiffy count.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ron Lee <ron@...ian.org>
> 
> ---
>  kernel/sched_clock.c |    3 ++-
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_clock.c b/kernel/sched_clock.c
> index a0b0852..a1567b1 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_clock.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_clock.c
> @@ -37,7 +37,8 @@
>   */
>  unsigned long long __attribute__((weak)) sched_clock(void)
>  {
> -	return (unsigned long long)jiffies * (NSEC_PER_SEC / HZ);
> +	return (unsigned long long)(jiffies - INITIAL_JIFFIES)
> +					* (NSEC_PER_SEC / HZ);
>  }
>  
>  static __read_mostly int sched_clock_running;

Why?  I assume that you encountered some problem which was fixed
by this patch.  What was that problem?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/