lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 9 May 2009 10:25:29 +0800
From:	谢纲 <xiegang112@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Can I/O order be guaranteed by submitting sycn bio

Hi,

Some journal file systems submits sycn bio to do ordered write  if the
device does not support barrier i/o. But the sync bio only implies the
unplug of the request queue. Some elevators may reorder the request.
It's seems that the bio only with BIO_RW_SYNC flag could not guarantee
the write order. Is this true?

If so, is there any better way to do ordered write when there is no
barrier i/o support.

Thanks,

-- 
Xie Gang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ