lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 11:29:39 +1000 From: Ben Nizette <bn@...sdigital.com> To: nicolas.ferre@...el.com Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel <kernel@...32linux.org> Subject: [PATCH] atmel-lcdc: Fix pixclock upper bound detection AFAICT the code which checks that the requested pixclock value is within bounds is incorrect. It ensures that the lcdc core clock is at least (bytes per pixel) times higher than the pixel clock rather than just greater than or equal to. There are tighter restrictions on the pixclock value as a function of bus width for STN panels but even then it isn't a simple relationship as currently checked for. IMO either something like the below patch should be applied or else more detailed checking logic should be implemented which takes in to account the panel type as well. CMIIW :-) Signed-off-by: Ben Nizette <bn@...sdigital.com> --- diff --git a/drivers/video/atmel_lcdfb.c b/drivers/video/atmel_lcdfb.c index 9a577a8..5779641 100644 --- a/drivers/video/atmel_lcdfb.c +++ b/drivers/video/atmel_lcdfb.c @@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ static int atmel_lcdfb_check_var(struct fb_var_screeninfo *var, dev_dbg(dev, " bpp: %u\n", var->bits_per_pixel); dev_dbg(dev, " clk: %lu KHz\n", clk_value_khz); - if ((PICOS2KHZ(var->pixclock) * var->bits_per_pixel / 8) > clk_value_khz) { + if (PICOS2KHZ(var->pixclock) > clk_value_khz) { dev_err(dev, "%lu KHz pixel clock is too fast\n", PICOS2KHZ(var->pixclock)); return -EINVAL; } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists