linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Input: add MAX7359 key switch controller driver, v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 10 May 2009 19:08:36 -0700
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:	Kim Kyuwon <q1.kim@...sung.com>
Cc:	Trilok Soni <soni.trilok@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: add MAX7359 key switch controller driver, v2

Hi KIm,

On Sunday 10 May 2009 18:51:32 Kim Kyuwon wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> Thank you for streamlining this driver. I confirmed this streamlined driver
> is nicely working on my S3C6410 board and of course I mostly like your
> changes.

Great, thanks for testing.

> But I'm afraid this 'error' variable is not used at the final
> return statement in the probe function.

*blush* Hm, apparently I did not quite finish converting it all to use
"error" ;) I personally like calling such variables "error" if they are
"returned" only in error path and "ret" or "retval" when they are
returned upon both error and successful completion of a function.
I will fold your patch into the original version, thanks a lot.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/