lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 13 May 2009 13:40:42 +0900
From:	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
To:	michael@...erman.id.au
CC:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix MSI-X with NIU cards

Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
> It seems that this issue was introduced by Matthew's commit:
> commit f2440d9acbe866b917b16cc0f927366341ce9215
> <quote>
> @@ -435,11 +432,12 @@ static int msix_capability_init(struct pci_dev *dev,
>                 entry->msi_attrib.is_msix = 1;
>                 entry->msi_attrib.is_64 = 1;
>                 entry->msi_attrib.entry_nr = j;
> -               entry->msi_attrib.maskbit = 1;
> -               entry->msi_attrib.masked = 1;
>                 entry->msi_attrib.default_irq = dev->irq;
>                 entry->msi_attrib.pos = pos;
>                 entry->mask_base = base;
> +               entry->masked = readl(base + j * PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE +
> +                                       PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL_OFFSET);
> +               msix_mask_irq(entry, 1);
> 
>                 list_add_tail(&entry->list, &dev->msi_list);
>         }
> </quote>
> 
> I'm not sure why Matthew changed it to read/write...

Sorry, I got it.

The problem is not the bit[0] for mask, but the reserved bits[31::01].
According to the Spec:
"31::01 Reserved 
  After reset, the state of these bits must be 0.
  However, for potential future use, software must preserve the value of
  these reserved bits when modifying the value of other Vector Control bits.
  If software modifies the value of these reserved bits, the result is
  undefined."

I'll post a revised fix soon.

Thanks,
H.Seto

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ