lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 00:17:29 -0700 From: Chris Peterson <cpeterso@...terso.com> To: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [resend] drivers/net: remove network drivers' last few uses of IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM > The future model will continue to sample network > devices on theory that they -might- be less than 100% observable and > that can only increase our total (unmeasurable) amount of entropy. That sounds reasonable to me. So should all net drivers now specify IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM? Or even simpler: could request_irq() assume IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM for any interrupt that is not (say) IRQF_IRQPOLL or IRQF_PERCPU? chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/