linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: fix system without memory on node0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 13 May 2009 10:00:10 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix system without memory on node0

> +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) && defined(CONFIG_NUMA)
> +	/*
> +	 * make sure boot cpu node_number is right, when boot cpu is on the
> +	 * node that doesn't have mem installed
> +	 */
> +	per_cpu(node_number, boot_cpu_id) = cpu_to_node(boot_cpu_id);
> +#endif

Seems like a quite crappy hac^wpatch. Why is it ever set to the wrong
value? And why is that only the case on NUMA and 64bit? 

-Andi (who is also doubtful that the rest of the system can handle
memory less memory nodes in all cases)

-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/