lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 09:02:05 +0800 From: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com> To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> CC: nauman@...gle.com, dpshah@...gle.com, lizf@...fujitsu.com, mikew@...gle.com, fchecconi@...il.com, paolo.valente@...more.it, jens.axboe@...cle.com, ryov@...inux.co.jp, fernando@....ntt.co.jp, s-uchida@...jp.nec.com, taka@...inux.co.jp, jmoyer@...hat.com, dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, righi.andrea@...il.com, agk@...hat.com, dm-devel@...hat.com, snitzer@...hat.com, m-ikeda@...jp.nec.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] IO Controller: Add per-device weight and ioprio_class handling Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:00:21AM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote: > > [..] >> @@ -2137,7 +2366,7 @@ void elv_fq_unset_request_ioq(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq) >> void bfq_init_entity(struct io_entity *entity, struct io_group *iog) >> { >> entity->ioprio = entity->new_ioprio; >> - entity->weight = entity->new_weight; >> + entity->weight = entity->new_weigh; >> entity->ioprio_class = entity->new_ioprio_class; >> entity->sched_data = &iog->sched_data; >> } >> diff --git a/block/elevator-fq.h b/block/elevator-fq.h >> index db3a347..0407633 100644 >> --- a/block/elevator-fq.h >> +++ b/block/elevator-fq.h >> @@ -253,6 +253,14 @@ struct io_group { >> #endif >> }; >> >> +struct policy_node { > > Would "io_policy_node" be better? Sure > >> + struct list_head node; >> + char dev_name[32]; >> + void *key; >> + unsigned long weight; >> + unsigned long ioprio_class; >> +}; >> + >> /** >> * struct bfqio_cgroup - bfq cgroup data structure. >> * @css: subsystem state for bfq in the containing cgroup. >> @@ -269,6 +277,9 @@ struct io_cgroup { >> >> unsigned long weight, ioprio_class; >> >> + /* list of policy_node */ >> + struct list_head list; >> + > > How about "struct list_head policy_list" or "struct list_head io_policy"? OK -- Regards Gui Jianfeng -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists