linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kmemcheck: make bitfield annotations be valid C

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 16 May 2009 09:40:08 +0300
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kmemcheck: make bitfield annotations be valid C

On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com> wrote:
> From bb8926742d87da95aeb373bc2d4b35a554c5001b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
> Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 21:34:36 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] kmemcheck: make bitfield annotations be valid C
>
> According to Al Viro, the syntax we were using (putting #ifdef inside
> macro arguments) was not valid C. He also suggested using begin/end
> markers instead, which is what we do now.
>
> Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>

Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>

Al, are you okay with this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/