linux-kernel - Re: How to tell whether a struct file is held by a process?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 22 May 2009 20:24:15 +0200
From:	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
To:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Kyle Moffett <kyle@...fetthome.net>,
	Pantelis Koukousoulas <pktoss@...il.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: How to tell whether a struct file is held by a process?

On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 17:54, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> wrote:

>> Would releasing the "lock" trigger a kernel-driver-binding call?
>
> No.  If the lock owner wants to bind kernel drivers, it can use the
> existing API in libusb after releasing the lock.  This might cause
> problems if the owning process terminates abnormally, but I think we
> can live with that.
>
>> The lock will always lock all devices of a specific hub?
>
> The idea is that there will be one lock file per port.  So for example,
> a hub device with four ports might contain inside its sysfs device
> directory: ports/1, ..., ports/4.

Sounds both good to me.

Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/